http://advance.bluesoftware.com/hubfs/Images/BLUE_Web_Redesign/BLOG/BLOG_main_images/BLOG_main_calculatingROI.jpg

Intuitively it just seems like a good idea to replace job folders with an Artwork Management System (AMS), but usually a little more than intuition is required to spend money. Every organization has an approval process for funding and in order to get approval, you’re going to need to justify the cost.

Enter the ROI calculator. By punching in a few numbers it can magically spit out that one single number you need to convince management that an AMS is right for your business! If only it were that easy.

I’m not against an ROI calculator, in fact, I believe it can provide great value, and it’s a commonly used tool that CFO’s and CEO’s are comfortable with. The challenge is in the truth behind the numbers. Accuracy is critical and savings are often hard to predict because, well, it's a prediction. And the ROI calculation isn’t the only way to justify the cost. It’s just one piece of the full picture, but I’ll come back to that later.

Let's begin with the numbers. A good place to start is to create a list of areas that present an opportunity for time and cost savings:

  1. Asset Recreation 
  2. Asset Searching 
  3. Asset Distribution 
  4. Proofing 
  5. Project Management Time
  6. Audit Tracking

We’ll walk through some ways to measure each. And if you have specific real-life examples that fit into any of these areas it will make your business case all the more compelling.

 

1. Asset Recreation

How often are assets recreated because the original can’t be found? When dealing with large numbers of assets dispersed across a wide variety of media, it is not surprising that some assets are lost or a person in one location is not aware that what he or she requires has already been created by someone else in another location. These assets may reside on an employee’s hard drive, on various repositories throughout the organization, with agencies and so on. 

When staff can’t quickly find a specific asset there is a natural temptation to simply recreate the same asset (again and again). The result is a multitude of similar assets, all individually paid for. The cost of recreation will vary depending on the type of asset it is but generally ranges from $500 up to as high as $20,000 if a second photo shoot and retouching are required.

Additionally, even when the original asset is available for re-use, a different file type may need to be created to satisfy the intended use. For example, a high resolution Photoshop file may be required as a GIF for web use. This requires someone with the right software tools to generate the GIF from the original file.

Assumptions:

  • Industry analysts estimate up to 30% of all content is recreated because it is lost or mismanaged
  • A typical organization has 5,000 brand related assets
  • $500 recreation cost per asset (this is the low end of typical recreation costs)

What numbers are right for your organization? 

Industry standards are a good rule of thumb and maybe you want to use them, but make sure they’re relevant and meaningful to your organization. Think about your organizational structure. If you operate in 1 country and your assets are centrally controlled, 30% may be too high for you. Do some homework and adjust this to a defendable number for your organization. Do you have 5000 brand related assets? Some companies have 10 brands and others have hundreds. Whatever your number is, it should include related assets, such as photography, logos, drawings, etc.

Once you’ve worked out your numbers, do the calculation: 5000 brand assets * 10% content creation * $500 cost = $250,000

 

2. Asset Searching

How easy is it to find what you have? 

With assets dispersed across an organization on various systems or on employee’s hard drives, there is no way to determine where an asset is or even if what someone needs already exists. Some employees who have been with the company for years may have some insight into where assets are located but what happens when those employees leave the organization?

Assumptions:

  • A typical knowledge worker spends 2.5 hours per day searching for content that isn’t indexed 
  • Average hourly cost of a knowledge worker = $30/hr
  • Content indexed in a rich media management system takes 90% less time to locate 

What numbers are right for your organization? The 2.5 hours number above may be true for all content, but maybe a better correlation for brand assets would be to use the number of campaigns annually. How many campaigns do you typically run a year and how long do you spend finding the files required for the campaign?

6 campaigns * 20 brands * 8 hours/campaign * $30/hr * 90% = $25,920

 

3. Asset Distribution

How do assets get to the people who need them? With assets dispersed across organizations on various systems or on employee’s hard drives, there are a variety of distribution methods. Email may be a common distribution channel for some content although most organizations have limits set to control the size of files sent via email. With digital content, large files are common and may be sent via courier.

Is file conversion required? You likely don’t want everyone to have the high res production files so instead you’re converting for use. Depending on the volume, this can be a time-consuming and repetitive task. 

Assumptions:

  • 500 files (possibly converted) and sent per year
  • 30 min/file required (find, convert, copy, send, log)
  • Content manager cost - $30/hr
  • 10% of 500 files distributed are sent via courier
  • 90% of 500 files distributed are sent electronically
  • $50 courier fee 

What numbers are right for your organization?

450 files sent electronically * 30 min/file @ $30/hour = $6,750
50 files couriered * $50 courier fee = $2,500

 

 

4. Proofing 

An AMS typically offers some type of online proofing and collaboration tool. These tools can save considerable time both in the proofing process and with the project manager in tracking and collating comments from multiple reviewers. From creative concept through to delivery to the printer, artwork goes through multiple review cycles. 

Without an online proofing capability, proofs are typically managed either via email or in a physical job folder and in some cases the job folder may be couriered to reviewers in other locations.

There are many ways to identify timesavings with an online job tracking system:

  • Reviewers have an electronic task list so don’t need to search for what’s outstanding or risk losing a physical folder
  • Reviewers can do automated comparisons between iterations of files to see what’s been changed since the last round (vs. manually confirming changes)
  • Reviews can be done in parallel, saving time in the process
  • Designers have clearer instructions from reviewer online notes, instead of hard to read hand-written notes

So how do you measure all of this? Again, you’ll need to do some analysis within your organization, but experience has shown us the following based on 500 SKU updates/year:

Assumptions:

  • 500 SKU updates a year
  • 8 reviewers per SKU (could include concept, production art or prepress files)
  • 3 cycles required per SKU
  • Reviewer time saved – 10 minutes/cycle
  • Designer time saved – 10 minutes/cycle

Reviewers: 500 SKU’s * 3 cycles * 8 reviewers * 10 minutes/cycle * $30/hour = $60,000
Designer: 500 SKU’s * 3 cycles * 10 minutes/cycle * $30/hour = $7,500

If you’re using courier instead of, or in addition to email, include that cost in your total.

 

5. Project Management

Without an electronic workflow solution, someone in your organization is tasked with ensuring projects are completed on schedule. What do they do? 
  • Collect project information & ensure it’s complete
  • Ensure the designer has what he/she needs to do the requested work
  • Get the artwork to the right approvers & chase them for their sign-off
  • Coordinate requested changes with the designer
  • Maintain excel spreadsheets to track project schedules
  • Get the files to the pre-press agency and/or printer
  • Make sure the approved files are properly archived

Many organizations have a team of full time people to do this. How many do you have? An AMS won’t eliminate this role, but it will make life a lot easier. With some dashboards in place, the Project Managers can see progress for all of their projects & setup automated notifications for at risk and late projects. And the system will look after prompting people when information is needed and notifying them when their action is required.

 

Assumptions:

  • 500 projects/year
  • 16 hours of project management time saved per project
  • $30/hour rate
  • 50% savings with an AMS

500 * 16 hours/project * $30/hour * 50% = $120,000

 

6. Audit Tracking

At some point every organization needs to trace how an artwork got released. It’s a time consuming process if approvals were done through email and design changes were communicated over the phone or in hand-written notes. We’re seeing an increase in the need for this as regulatory requirements expand. Assuming you’ll need to do this twice a year and it takes 40 hours each time we get a total of:

2 audits/year * 40 hours * $30/hour = $2,400

  1. Adding it all up:
  2. Asset Recreation = $250,000 
  3. Asset Searching = $25,920
  4. Asset Distribution = $9250
  5. Proofing = $67,500
  6. Project Management Time = $120,000
  7. Audit Tracking = $2,400
Total = $475,070

 

With a little investigation you can come up with a cost savings number that can be used to calculate your ROI. The key to any ROI calculation is to make sure you personalize it to your business. Industry Standards can be useful, but they’re generic by nature so don’t automatically assume you fit the mold.

Keep in mind that there are several assumptions being made about the AMS you choose. The following is a baseline of what you should expect from an AMS:

  • The system is easy & intuitive to use and doesn’t require a lot of training
  • Assets are tagged with the correct metadata
  • The system is self serve and/or files can easily be published to people who need them
  • ‘On-the-fly’ file conversion is available 
  • Project schedules are managed in the system & easily accessible
  • Email notifications prompt users when action is required
  • Reviewers have the ability to comment online on proofs to request changes
  • Reviewers have the ability to systematically compare a proof to a previous version
  • A full audit trail is kept for asset history

So is that all there is to building a business case? Definitely not. The ROI calculation is just one part of the picture. Stay tuned and I’ll cover Strategic Alignment and the “What if I don’t do anything?” perspective to bring all of the pieces together.

Jackie Leslie is a Senior Business Development Engineer at BLUE.

[This post includes titles and references to Schawk that preceded December 21, 2014, when Diversis, a Private Equity firm, acquired a majority share of BLUE, creating BLUE Software, LLC.]


 

Topics: BLUE